Recombinant FVIIIFc Versus BAY 94-9027 for Treatment of Patients with Haemophilia A: Comparative Efficacy Using a Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparative Efficacy of Ibrutinib Versus Obinutuzumab + Chlorambucil in First-Line Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
INTRODUCTION Ibrutinib (ibr) monotherapy and the combination of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil (obi) are approved for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). No trials directly comparing their efficacy are available. Therefore a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to provide insight into their relative efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) ...
متن کاملa comparison of teachers and supervisors, with respect to teacher efficacy and reflection
supervisors play an undeniable role in training teachers, before starting their professional experience by preparing them, at the initial years of their teaching by checking their work within the proper framework, and later on during their teaching by assessing their progress. but surprisingly, exploring their attributes, professional demands, and qualifications has remained a neglected theme i...
15 صفحه اولMatching-adjusted indirect comparisons of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 vs two recombinant factor VIII for the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A
BACKGROUND No head-to-head trials comparing recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products currently exist. This was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study of efficacy of BAY 81-8973 with antihemophilic factor (recombinant) plasma/albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) and turoctocog alfa for the prophylaxis of severe hemophilia A. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to iden...
متن کاملComparative Efficacy of Guanfacine Extended Release Versus Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Applying Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methodology
BACKGROUND No head-to-head clinical trials have been published comparing guanfacine extended release (GXR) and atomoxetine (ATX): two nonstimulants approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, other study designs or methods could be used to indirectly compare these two medications. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is a recent methodology th...
متن کاملComparative efficacy of vildagliptin and sitagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of randomized trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Vildagliptin and sitagliptin are oral dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors approved in Japan for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus when adequate glycaemic control is not achieved with diet, exercise or sulphonylureas. The aim of this study was to compare 12-week glycaemic control with vildagliptin 50 mg twice daily versus sitagliptin 50 or 100 mg once daily in Japa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Advances in Therapy
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0741-238X,1865-8652
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01599-1